Critics find this German attitude surprising since the German economy is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the monetary union. The far reaching labour market reforms and wage restraint exercised in Germany over the last decade enhanced its labour market competitiveness over the other Eurozone economies.
The tight embrace of a single currency meant that Germany's competitors did not have access to the most conventional instrument used to address trade competitiveness - exchange rate devaluation. In fact, far from exercising similar reforms and wage restraints to match Germany, the peripheral economies experienced a decade of asset bubble and/or debt driven economic boom, which drove up labour wages. The graph below shows how wages remained more or less stagnant in Germany, even as it rose elsewhere.
Labour market was not the only source of distortions. The monetary union and the attendant boost to their sovereign risk ratings meant that the peripheral economies suddenly had access to very cheap capital, a major share of which came from German and French banks. This too went towards fuelling asset bubbles (Spain and Ireland), wage price spirals (Portugal), government spending (Greece and Italy), and a consumption boom. Thanks to its increasing competitiveness, Germany provided the natural supplier for consumption booms in these countries. German exports ballooned.
So, as I have blogged earlier, among other things, the recovery path for the peripheral economies will certainly have to involve efforts to restore labour market competitiveness. This can be achieved either through internal devaluation or wage moderation in the peripheral economies or inflation in the core economies. Given the magnitude of re-balancing required, it may be necessary to have both.
But even with all this and without some form of radical debt restructuring and extendend period of monetary accommodation by the ECB, the survival of the Euro project looks increasingly in doubt.
Paul Krugman points to the importance of export growth in Germany's economic growth of the last decade. A large share of these exports are to fellow Eurozone members, including the PIIGS. As the consumption elsewhere tanks, German exports will take a hit. It is impossible to expect consumption in these economies to regain its strength any time soon. In the circumstances, the only option left is for a massive German fiscal stimulus. This would not only keep aggregate demand in Germany up, but also provide an anchor for imports from the weak peripheral economies. In other words, German pump priming could boost growth both domestically and in the rest of Eurozone.
There are obviously two issues of concern. One, what magnitude of stimulus would be required to have any meaningful impact? Two, does Germany have the fiscal fire-power to sustain a big bazooka?
Update 1 (10/12/2011)
Nowhere has the benefits of euro integration more apparent than in the labour market as the graphic below shows. The German unemployment rate has steadily fallen since 2006, while that elsewhere has risen. German unemployment rate fell from 9.6% (4 million out of work) at the end of 2006 to 5.5% (just 2.3 million people out of work) today, both the figures being the lowest since the 1991 reunification.
As Floyd Norris writes, "It held down its labor costs during the boom, strengthening its competitive position relative to other members of the euro zone. The fact that those countries were in the euro zone helped to depress the currency’s value relative to other currencies, which made German exporters even more competitive."
This is a stunning statistic about the contrasting fortunes of the two parts of Europe,
"Put another way, at the end of 2006, 32 percent of the unemployed workers in the euro zone were Germans. Now the figure for Germans is 14 percent. The peripheral countries’ share went to 61 percent from 39 percent."