1. The rise of zero-sum politics in the West.
In the US, UK, France and Germany zero-sum beliefs on the left (eg people only get rich by making others poor) and the right (eg immigrants succeed at the expense of the native-born) are related expressions of the same underlying worldview. Namely that there is only so much to go around and we must therefore use restrictions, exactions and preferential treatment to redress the balance between winners and losers.
2. Primer on how the Labour Codes will contribute to the formalisation of the economy.
3. Tim Wu contrasts America's all-in bet on proprietary AI-led innovation with China's diversified bet on renewables and green technologies coupled with applications of AI through open-source models. The article has this graphic which shows how Chinese exports to developing countries has taken off exponentially.
Last year, 70 per cent of the world’s EVs were manufactured in China. China also accounts for roughly 80-85 per cent of global solar photovoltaic manufacturing, and more than 75 per cent of all global battery production.
4. Data centre construction in the US is now on par with office construction!
And this on their power demand.
Across America, data centres represent a combined capacity of about 51GW. Running at their maximum, this equates to 5 per cent of the country’s peak demand. By 2028, an estimated 44GW of additional capacity will be required by new data centres, according to S&P Global Energy. Given constraints to grid infrastructure, power capacity coming online in the next three years will only be able to provide about 25GW for these data centres. That leaves a gap of 19GW — just over 40 per cent of the power needed... After more than two decades of flat or anaemic growth, US power demand is now surging. Electricity usage is projected to rise by an average of 5.7 per cent a year to 2030, based on forecasts from utility companies... more than half of the expected increase stems from the rapid build-out of AI data centres, according to consultancy Grid Strategies.
And the constraints to power capacity expansion.
Boosting the US power grid is an enormous and time-consuming task due to a complex web of regulatory, financial and supply chain challenges. Interconnection queues — backlogs of projects waiting to plug into the network — have become a major chokepoint, slowing the rollout of new power capacity and leaving data centres facing lengthy delays... The average time from filing an interconnection request to achieving commercial operation now exceeds eight years, according to energy think-tank RMI... On average, federal permitting for a new US transmission line takes about four years, according to the Department of Energy. State processes add further delays to grid build-out. Last year, almost 900 miles of new high-voltage transmission lines were completed, according to lobby group Americans for a Clean Energy Grid. This is the most since 2020, but still far short of the 5,000 miles a year the group estimates is needed to support grid reliability and growth.
Edinburgh-based energy consultant Wood Mackenzie estimates the country’s solar module manufacturing capacity will exceed 125GW by 2025, which is more than three times its domestic demand of around 40GW. Nomura projects capacity additions of 100-110GW in the next three years, further raising the risk of oversupply and painful consolidation.
This is an interesting comparison with China, pointing to future pain.
In China, half of the six major solar IPOs of the past two decades now trade below their issue price. In the US, SunPower has filed for bankruptcy. Even today, China’s JA Solar, with nearly 85GW each of ingot-wafer and cell capacity, is valued on par with India’s Waaree Energies, which has only a fraction of that scale... Some distress from oversupply is already visible in the supply chain. While the large, cash-rich players, including Adani, Waaree and Premier Energies, are tightening their hold on the sector by backward-integrating their supply chain and protecting their future margins, the smaller players are struggling to keep their plants running.
Worsening matters further is the lack of demand for solar power among discoms.
India’s solar energy capacity currently totals 130GW, according to the ministry of new and renewable energy... As of September, around 44GW of tendered clean energy capacity, out of 93GW since fiscal year 2024 (FY24), remains without buyers... The ministry said in early November that it may look to cancel these projects on a case-by-case basis. One of the primary reasons for unsigned agreements is that state utilities expect solar prices to fall further.
This capacity explosion has been facilitated by industrial policy.
In 2022, India imposed 40% tariffs on solar modules and 25% tariffs on solar cells to discourage imports from China. Last year, the country dictated that Indian solar power producers must purchase from an approved list of domestic solar-module makers—there are 93 companies in the approved list so far. Similar rules for solar cells will come into effect next year. Further restrictions on imports of ingots and wafers that are building blocks of modules and cells are expected in the coming years.
But industrial policy does not appear to be able to bridge competitiveness.
Under new domestic content requirements, an entirely ‘Made in India’ module would cost more than double Chinese-manufactured modules, making it uncompetitive without substantial government policy support.
While India's solar manufacturing capacity is now largely at the level of modules, the government is pushing hard to integrate backwards into cells, ingots, wafers, and polycrystalline. But that's challenging.
Owing to the complexities involved, the cell is the most capex-intensive segment. According to Nomura, capital expenditure per GW of cells can total ₹6,500 crore versus ₹2,000 crore for modules. Ingots and wafers need up to ₹4,500 to build 1GW capacity. As the supply glut in modules deepens, large integrated players such as Reliance Industries, Adani Enterprises, Waaree, Premier and Tata Power, which are investing across the value chain, are better positioned to survive... All large and listed players have announced plans to backward integrate, expecting that impending import restrictions further down the value chain will keep profits coming. According to Nomura, 70-80GW of cell capacity additions will come online over the next three years. It is 18.5GW right now.
Solar energy has the lowest tariff rate.
6. As developed countries grapple with high and rising debt burdens, some pointers.
While the ratio of debt to GDP in the world’s biggest economy shrank from 106 per cent in 1946 to 21.6 per cent in 1990-91, it has since lurched back up to almost 100 per cent thanks to, among other things, the financial crisis and Covid-19... The postwar experience of the UK provides a case study of how these factors interact. The country’s debt-to-GDP ratio went from more than 250 per cent in 1946 to just 42 per cent three decades later. In a seminal piece of research, Barry Eichengreen and Rui Esteves show that for most of the 1946 to 1955 debt consolidation episode, the UK ran consistent, large primary budget surpluses despite the Labour government’s huge expansion of the welfare state. Yet the largest contribution to debt reduction came from inflation, which was responsible for more than 80 per cent of the debt consolidation over the period. That said, from 1955, fiscal discipline and economic growth did most of the work — surprisingly given Britain’s record at the time for economic incompetence — because the contribution of consumer price inflation, which peaked at 24 per cent in 1975, was neutralised by rocketing interest rates.
7. K-shaped income gain + K-shaped wealth gain = K-shaped economy. Rana Faroohar writes about the K-shaped economy in the US.
Consider income growth, which was higher for low-income households right before and during the pandemic — in large part because of support from the Biden administration — but has diverged since. Wage growth for low-income workers is now lower than for middle- and high-income workers. This is partly explained by the artificial intelligence boom that is showing up in higher unemployment figures for young college graduates as more entry-level white-collar work is done by technology. Asset growth is K-shaped too, with higher-income households seeing lots of paper wealth from stocks at still near-record highs and rising home prices. According to investment group Apollo, the cash flow received in fixed income, including private credit, is nearing levels not seen in decades. That wealth effect has propelled the existing K-shaped trend in consumer spending. The percentage of overall spending done by the top 10 per cent of the socio-economic spectrum has risen from 36 per cent to nearly half since 1989, according to Moody’s analytics.
8. Daron Acemoglu points to the breakdown of the liberal democratic politics.
Liberal democracy was made by its pledges. It plunged into crisis because of their undoing. A lot of this volte-face was about the eclipse of the industrial compact and the rise of a post-industrial society, dominated by digital technologies and the college-educated professionals that these empowered. Digital technologies severed the link between economic growth and shared prosperity. With the widespread automation enabled by digital tools, companies could expand without hiring more employees and paying workers more, and the skill bias of these technologies gave a boost to the earnings of highly educated and managerial workers. The result was a staggering increase in inequality in the US, with the inflation-adjusted wages of low-education men falling most years between 1980 and 2014 — even as the aggregate economy and the urban, globalised professionals were flourishing.
That the computer age was leaving behind the working class, which used to typically support left-leaning parties, was unnoticed by the college-educated, who were becoming politically and socially ascendant in the environment digital technologies created. That they had started living separately, socialising separately, marrying separately, and holding very different views from the less educated undergirded this omission. There was also a major sin of commission on the part of left liberals. As they abandoned classic working-class or social democratic issues, they started focusing on cultural politics — in part because cultural divides had become more pronounced and in some ways more intractable in an age defined by shifting mores, globalisation and increasing immigration flows from countries with dissimilar traditions.But the cultural divide that emerged between different education groups and ideologies did not have a simple solution. Even as norms were changing on important issues such as gay marriage, new rifts were opening related to the assimilation of new immigrants, transgender rights and cosmopolitan versus local priorities. The college-educated, fatefully, turned to social engineering efforts, trying to accelerate cultural change — in universities, schools, the entertainment industry and even workplaces. These efforts, though often well meaning, were nonetheless perceived by many working-class communities as the imposition of the priorities of college-educated values on the rest of society. The scene was set for a crisis of liberalism and of liberal democracy.
9. Importance of Samarium, a rare earth mineral, and how the US gave up its leadership.
Most rare-earth magnets are made of neodymium, which is used in everyday applications such as cellphones, auto parts and electronics. But the defense industry requires samarium-cobalt magnets, which can withstand extreme heat... Unless new sources of samarium or a substitute material can be found, American manufacturers won’t be able to build fighter jets or precision-guided missiles. They may be forced to sacrifice precision if they can’t get the right magnets...Although samarium-cobalt magnets were invented in an Air Force research lab in Ohio in the 1960s, the industry moved to China in the 1980s, partly because of rich rare-earth deposits there. Today, China mines, processes, sells and consumes such large volumes of rare-earth metals that it can drop the price below the cost of production when foreign competitors come online. American and European companies have struggled to stay afloat. Many either declared bankruptcy or opened factories in China.
And the difficulty of reshoring, even with good policy intent, without a crisis hitting.
In recent years, American policymakers have tried to build a domestic supply. The National Defense Authorization Act of 2023 and 2024 gradually tightened restrictions on the use of rare-earth metals from China in weapons systems, and stipulated that all such materials must be China-free by Jan. 1, 2027. But such mandates have been inconsistently enforced, partly because alternatives are not available. In 2023 and 2024, when magnets were supposed to be made of metal that was created outside China, Lockheed Martin notified the Pentagon that its F-35 Joint Strike Fighter had Chinese-made magnets. The military paused production of the jet for months but eventually issued a waiver allowing the parts.
10. The Bank of Japan raises its benchmark interest rates to a 30 year high.
Alongside, yields on 10 year government bonds have touched 2% for the first time since 1999.
11. Assessment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code implementation.
The data from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) shows that by September, 8,659 corporate insolvency resolution processes (CIRPs) had been admitted. Of those 1,898 cases were ongoing. More tellingly, about 1,300 CIRPs that resulted in resolution plans took an average of 603 days, while 2,896 cases that ended in liquidation took 518 days, far exceeding the statutory outer limit of 330 days prescribed under the IBC... Despite procedural delays, the IBC has had a meaningful impact on India’s banking system and credit culture. Resolved cases have delivered 32.44 per cent recovery of admitted claims, translating into more than 170 per cent of liquidation value, and have helped rescue about 1,300 firms. Equally important, the threat of losing control has altered borrower behaviour, improving repayment discipline and encouraging early settlement.
12. US corporate profits are at all time highs.
14. Financial engineering is never far away in boom times. FT reports how Big Tech firms are shifting debts assumed to finance AI spending out of their balance sheets through project financed SPVs.
Financial institutions including Pimco, BlackRock, Apollo, Blue Owl Capital and US banks such as JPMorgan have supplied at least $120bn in debt and equity for these tech groups’ computing infrastructure, according to a Financial Times analysis. That money is channelled through special purpose holding companies known as SPVs. The rush of financings, which do not show up on the tech companies’ balance sheets, may be obscuring the risks that these groups are running — and who will be on the hook if AI demand disappoints...Tapping private capital funding through off-balance sheet structures protects companies’ credit ratings and flatters their financial metrics. Meta in October completed the largest private credit data centre deal, a $30bn agreement for its proposed Hyperion facility in Louisiana that created an SPV called Beignet Investor with New York financing firm Blue Owl Capital. The SPV raised $30bn, including about $27bn of loans from Pimco, BlackRock, Apollo and others, as well as $3bn in equity from Blue Owl. The deal meant Meta could in effect borrow $30bn without any of the debt appearing on its balance sheet. This made it easier to raise a further $30bn in the corporate bond market a few weeks later.
15. Demystifying Adam Smith's invisible hand
The popular understanding of the “invisible hand” is even further off the mark. Smith borrows the phrase from Macbeth, who talks about a “bloody and invisible hand” shortly before murdering Banquo. In all his works, the economist mentions the phrase just three times, in three different contexts—and never in reference to the price mechanism... In fact, he often favoured the visible hand of government. He urged the state to provide education. He favoured legal caps on interest rates. Today, almost all free-market economists despise America’s Jones Act, which requires that shipping between American ports be conducted on vessels that are built, owned and largely crewed domestically. Smith, by contrast, favoured the Navigation Acts, a similar British law.Smith acknowledged the benefits of markets, but also their costs. Consider his famous pin factory. The division of labour within it allowed workers to produce thousands more pins than if they were working alone. Countries that perfected the art of dividing labour, Smith argued, would grow rich. Yet he also worried that a life spent on a few simple operations would make a labourer “as stupid and ignorant as it is possible for a human...to become”. Did Smith think the costs outweighed the benefits? It is hard to be sure.
16. VC failure rates
Sequoia’s best-ever US fund had half its investments fail.
17. Cross-border payments company Aspora is disrupting US-India remittance transfers.
Fintechs Wise and Remitly do that by partnering with a local bank, with which they park funds worth two to three days of remittance volume as a lien. This fund lies as a security, untouched. Now, when a person in the US sends money to somebody in India, the fintech pings its Indian banking partner, which uses its own funds to make a local transfer to the recipient’s account. This reduces the speed of transfer from days to minutes. The fintech then reimburses the banking partner for all the transfers via a bulk cross-border transfer.... 30–40% of the $135 billion remittances to India are locked in as liens to banks. Aspora does about $300 million worth of remittances a month. So, to maintain two days’ worth of remittance volumes with its local banking partners, like Yes Bank, the startup needs to park away at least $20 million of capital... In 2024, Aspora chose to route nearly a third of its cross-border remittances through stablecoins. These digital currencies operate with little legal oversight and take away the need to have so much capital as a lien... In using stablecoins, all that a fintech like Aspora had to do was partner with a cryptoexchange in the originating and receiving countries. And in the process, it can simply swap the US dollar for a stablecoin like Tether. That gets swapped out for the rupee by another exchange in India. This swapping involves a fee of 20 basis points in all, said the crypto-exchange executive, as the exchanges also take care of compliance, conversion, and the payout. That’s much less than maintaining liquidity, which can add up to 1% of the total cost...
When a fintech uses stablecoins to process remittances, the recipients are in a fix. For one, Indians have to pay a 1% tax on the money they receive. Two, the instruction that comes along with the remittance would only show that the money came from an exchange, not the sender... In fact, in some cases, when users sent money to their own accounts in India, local banks, unable to see the sender, saw it as suspicious activity and blocked their accounts.
The big risk Aspora faces is regulatory. Though not banned in India, RBI does not recognise Stablecoins or cryptocurrencies generally. Only about 1% of the $135 bn annual remittances use Stablecoins for now.
The article also has an interesting graphic about the changes in sources of remittances into India. Declining share of Gulf remittances (except Qatar) and increasing shares from the US, UK, Australia, and Singapore.
And the US and Europe dominate the higher end of the supply-chain.
Huawei increased the proportion of Chinese-made components in the Mate 70 Pro to 57%. The estimated total component cost of the Pura 80 Pro is $380, with the Chinese-made component ratio steady at 57%... For the Pura 80 Pro's system-on-a-chip, which integrates multiple semiconductors, the company used the Kirin 9020 chipset designed by subsidiary HiSilicon... For DRAM, which handles short-term memory, Huawei switched from imported products to those made by ChangXin Memory Technologies. For long-term NAND flash memory, it switched to products made by Yangtze Memory Technologies. Huawei switched to products from BOE Technology Group for the organic light-emitting diode display, which is estimated to cost over $64 per unit.
But in recent years Chinese companies have also entered the sphere with state support, led by Kaluga Queen, a farm on Lake Qingdao. And they have dived in with such stunning efficiency and focus — echoing what has happened with, say, solar panels — that Kaluga is now the biggest caviar producer in the world. Indeed, China accounts for between half and two-thirds of global production... And Chinese officials now want their entrepreneurs to expand into other gourmet foods like smoked salmon, Wagyu beef and truffles. That is creating waves: at a recent meeting of the North Atlantic Seafood Forum, a Nordic luminary flourished a 7kg Chinese-farmed salmon on stage — and declared it to be tasty, and cheap because of Beijing’s subsidies. Meanwhile, the Japanese government has restricted exports of Wagyu genetics to China to protect its beef farmers, and some Italian and French caviar houses are complaining about the pricing threat from Chinese rivals. American caviar makers are reportedly lobbying the White House for protection, too.
22. Finally, in celebration of racial integration, the Springbok rugby team.
The one thing that unites South Africans of all colours is the Springboks rugby team... South African rugby has been so “transformed” — a word the African National Congress uses to mean overcoming the grim legacy of apartheid — that affirmative action is no longer necessary. A squad, picked purely on merit, is automatically multiracial. The Springboks’ most celebrated players include Siya Kolisi, the inspirational captain, who is Black and from an impoverished township in the Eastern Cape. Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu, the brilliant fly-half, has a Zulu mother and a father of Jewish heritage. The 50-plus member squad named this year by Johan “Rassie” Erasmus, the Afrikaner head coach who has led the team to successive World Cup victories, contains players from South Africa’s Black, white and so-called Coloured communities. The Springboks are a case study of what successful Black empowerment looks like. Where once players were selected from among 4.5mn white people, today they are drawn from the entirety of South Africa’s 65mn population.
No comments:
Post a Comment